Contacting Indigenous People

Source 1:
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/EXTINDPEOPLE/0,,contentMDK:20439647~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:407802,00.html

The world bank has engaged directly with indigenous people grant them homes and protect their rights. There reason for funding the indigenous people is to increase their communities and organizations capacity for self development and other things mentioned in their page. Also, they support the contact to map their lands and manage their natural resources.What the world bank doing is a nice thing to preserve the indigenous people rights and support them.


Source 2:
http://www.icmm.com/page/208/indigenous-peoples

the project of ICMM 2002 commissioned a review of the issues surrounding mining and indigenous peoples and it was published in 2005. Their work on idigenous peoples issues seeks to build effective and constructive relationships which are based on respect, meaningful engagement and mutual benefits. They want to contact the people to benefit the both sides.

Indigenous Population

I am on the side of leaving them to live their lives without any intervention from others for any reason even for medical help. They've been living like for a very long time and they are used to what happens to them in any case.

I read some of the UN rights for the indigenous population. Here is link for it :

http://stoptheintervention.org/facts/united-nations/un-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples

Chomsky vs Foucault - Debate

The two thinkers discuss the philosophy of human nature and the politics of justice and power. Chomsky stated his point at the beginning which is " the fundamental elements of human nature are the need for creative work, creative inquiry, free creation without obituary effects of coercion institutions". On the other side, Foucault claim was that we live under the power of class which is imposed by violence and there is no  democracy. I actually had a rough time understanding many of there points and reasons.

Both thinkers are a perfect example of how an argument or discussion should be like. No one interrupts the other. They both listened carefully and tried to understand what they try to deliver.